Let me get this out of the way: I am not a fan of conventional sports. Football, baseball, soccer, hockey, and basketball all bore me, and the amount of enthusiasm from both sides leads to obnoxious levels of noise. And speaking of not being a fan of conventional sports, I also dislike all those “inspirational” sports stories, like “Remember the Titans”, “Friday Night Lights”, “Warrior”, etc. They’ve become cliché with their uplifting endings and struggling teammates, and I’ve found that I’m able to safely predict the outcome of any of these movies whenever my folks drag me along to see one. Mostly, anyway.
And I say “mostly” because I’ve found a movie that has broken these cliched conventions to rise above the rest. You’ve seen ads for it, and you don’t have to take my word for it: other critics have been raving about it for weeks. That movie is “Moneyball”, and despite my resentment for the sports genre of movies, it’s become one of my favorite movies of the year.
Brad Pitt plays Billy Beane, the general manager of the ailing Oakland Athletics during the 2001 MLB post-season. We are informed before the film begins that the Athletics make a paltry $30 million or so a year, compared to the New York Yankees, who make about $140 million. Billy meets a young man named Peter Brand (Jonah Hill) who, using statistics, helps him build a winning team for as cheap a cost as possible. In this process, the Athletics lose several star players, while hiring players with questionable abilities. His scouts and coach disagree with Billy and Peter’s methods, and don’t think that team creation should be left to machines and the web. Billy’s idea appears to fail at first, but with a little effort and good coaching, the A’s gather a whopping 20 consecutive wins, an MLB record. Their streak is capped at that, but Billy is satisfied with his victories and methods. At the end of the movie, Beane is offered an opportunity to become the general manager of the Boston Red Sox, but he declines. Soon after, we are told that the Red Sox won the World Series in 2004, using the methods that Billy pioneered.
The acting in this movie is superb, and really, can you expect anything less from Brad Pitt and Jonah Hill? I must say though, that I’m used to seeing these actors in relatively more comical roles, in movies like “Superbad”, “Inglourious Basterds”, and “Snatch”. This is the first time I’ve seen Jonah Hill in a serious, dramatic role, and he performs it quite well. His character is a soft-spoken, computer-loving nerd, and while that’s similar to his role in “Superbad”, he is more expressive and contemplative here. And Brad Pitt, as always, is phenomenal, and perfect for the role. I sense an Oscar nomination next year for ol’ Brad.
To me, a sports movie with an uplifting, happy ending has become somewhat cliché, and it’s a trend that I really dislike. But “Moneyball” bypasses this by having an ending that, while satisfying, still leaves the audience with mixed feelings; joy and pride for the A’s, but disappointment in their loss and in Beane’s poor decision at the end.
There have been complaints from some of my friends as to the film’s inaccuracies, but as a non-sports buff, I really couldn’t care less. Movies aren’t meant to stick exactly to the source material, because otherwise they would have no business existing in the first place. This film is an interpretation, not a recreation. Sure, knowing the source material well can detract from your viewing experience (after reading McCarthy’s The Road, I knew the movie was going to disappoint), but movies are more than adaptations. As someone who could have really cared less about the 2002 baseball season back in the day, I really, really enjoyed it. Coming from someone who hates conventional sports, you really should go check it out.
Rating: *****